Recently, I watched a movie about the life of Joan of Arc (Jeanne d’Arc) called The Messenger, the Story of Joan of Arc by French director Luc Besson and starring Milla Jovovich. Though the movie got tepid reviews, I was mesmerized by it.
The period epic faithfully re-tells many key moments in the short life of the world-renown young French leader, including her actual words that were recorded in detailed written accounts. I found the movie intoxicating because of Jovivich’s exuberance as Joan, inspiring her countrymen to arms to free their nation, ensuring the crowning the Dauphin Prince in the Reims Cathedral as King, and following in her view the will of God.
Few other single individuals had such an impact on world history as this illiterate peasant girl, who rose to prominence in a violent male world and became one history’s greatest and most inspirational figures—and a saint for Catholic believers.
In fact no single historic figure from Europe during the 100 Years War between France and England remains as famous today as Joan. By the age of 17, she unswervingly acted on voices in her head telling her to drive the English from France and crown Charles VII as King of France. This came at France’s weakest moment in its history, with the English and Burgundians in control of half the country.
Yet, this virtual unknown girl never waivered. She gained access to the French court in the spring of 1429 in Chinon, France. She withstood questions from learned and suspicious church officials and a virginity test. She arrived in the besieged city of Orleans in April that year, bearing a standard and ready for action.
In defiance of cautious male commanders, she singlehandedly helped lead the French to defeat the attacking English, suffering several nearly fatal injuries. Her foes called her a witch and remained fearful of her talismanic powers. She brought together violent, power hungry men, like the Count of Dunois and the Duke of Alencon, around a common cause to the point they even would stop swearing and offered blind loyalty to her. Most importantly, she restored confidence of the French people around a common goal. Soon, all of Europe was talking about the Maid of Orleans and her battlefield exploits.
By July that year, Charles VII was crowned king. Yet within a year, the young peasant who worked miracles was captured and ransomed to the English, tried as a heretic, and burned at the stake in Rouen on May 27, 1431, for having worn men’s clothes, no less.
Five centuries after her murder, she was pronounced a saint by the Catholic Church for the miracles that are linked to her remarkable accomplishments. While she did promote violence, she always offered her opponents opportunities for peaceful alternatives, and she reportedly showed great kindness to those captured.
So why should anyone in public health care about Joan of Arc?
As a student of history, I found many elements of her remarkable story relevant for my reality. Instead of beleaguered 15th century France, I find myself in the reality of the beleaguered U.S. public health system.
Religion you say? That has nothing to do with healthcare and public health, right? Well, that ignores the fact that religion has everything to do with healthcare and public health. For example:
- Public health professionals regularly work with religious organizations to promote public health in their communities;
- Many of nation’s largest hospitals are run by religious bodies (one in six U.S. hospital patients is cared for in a Catholic-run hospital); and
- In Africa, faith-based groups (mostly Christian and Muslim) handle at least 40% of all healthcare, from HIV/AIDS interventions to maternal and child healthcare.
Well, an illiterate peasant girl can teach nothing of value to doctors, PhDs, and other well-educated professionals who run our nation’s public health system, right?
I recently read an article highlighting leadership and public health. Some of the attributes associated with leadership include: serving, complex thinking, being a change agent, self-empowerment to empower others, risking failure, creating a future one envisions, and being confident in one’s beliefs and then living the change one wants. I am actually hard-pressed to find examples of such traits in leaders in my field who are resonating widely with the American public. Joan of Arc consistently showed all of these leadership traits, from risking her life on the field, to being a catalyst, to having supreme confidence in her vision.
In the United States, there are always “unsung hero” awards for people who no one outside of the particular field giving the award have heard of, or even care about, it seems. While these may help sustain the field of providers, they likely do little to inspire the public.
The University of California Berkeley in February held its annual event for “public health heroes,” awarding its 2013 prize to former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher. However, I doubt few Americans know who Dr. Satcher is, what he accomplished, and why such facts matter to the nation’s crisis of promoting public health in the 21st century.
This is not to belittle Dr. Satcher’s many accomplishments, such as his calling attention to the oral health epidemic in the United States. (Oral health experts have been talking about his report for more than a decade because he and it were spot on.)
Public health, teetering like France before the arrival of Joan of Arc?
Or course medieval France has nothing in common with the reality of modern America and its healthcare system, right? But if you take the view of that history can teach open-minded students of the present many valuable lessons, regardless of their field, one might find parallels.
France at Joan’s time was on the verge of collapse, lacking strong leadership and a vision to restore hope and unity. Joan arrived completely confident in her vision and religious mission, and she never wasted a day. She famously said, “Better today than tomorrow, better tomorrow than the day after.” She also is remembered by her words, “go forth boldly.” Such words and such inspiration are lacking in the U.S. public health system, to me at least.
For those working in the field of public health, one is constantly exposed to the reality of budget cuts that continue to hack away at programs that do everything to promote chronic disease interventions to immunizations. Between 2008 and 2010 alone, in the aftermath of the Great Recession, more than half of all local public health departments had cut core funding and shed 23,000 jobs, as well as cut programs, mainly due to falling tax revenues that hammered local and state funding.
Things continue to spiral downward as the recession’s effects linger, and mandatory across the board federal budget cuts known as the sequester will soon impact every local public health department in the country and national agencies who help fund local efforts. The Public Health Institute warned that sequester related cuts will be “devastating to the public’s health.” Such cuts, the institute says, “will cost jobs and resources in the short run, and the long-term costs—in money and lives—will be borne by families and communities for years to come.”
Crises also prevent departments from looking to innovation as they focus on life support and triage. Morale suffers, which impacts service and core functions. Leadership, perhaps what little that may exist in this beleaguered environment, is lacking. Public health managers struggle to connect with the public about what public health is and why it matters.
They fail to show that the U.S. health system’s treatment, not prevention, focus is largely unsustainable for the population’s health and the economy. In 2009, U.S. public health spending (at all governmental levels) amounted to $76.2 billion – only 3% of the nation’s overall healthcare outlays of $2.5 trillion. Yet, chronic diseases, which public health efforts can address, make up three quarters of all health care costs.
Reform does happen, and it can be bold when breakthroughs capture the public’s and globe’s attention.
HIV/AIDS assistance, which is now at the heart of a larger global public health agenda, was launched in the late 1990s when activists outside of the medical and public health establishment demanded that antiretroviral drugs, or ARVs, be made available to many of the world’s poorest and most afflicted nations, most in Africa, to reduce the spread of the virus inside the bodies of infected people and make it possible for them to live long lives.
It was not reformers inside “the system,” it was radicals outside “the system,” who offered a clear vision and the groundswell for change that the establishment eventually fully embraced.
As someone who works inside “the bureaucracy,” however, I am ever mindful of how the great Joan of Arc was ultimately marginalized, tortured, and burned alive at the stake for her completely unorthodox ways that challenged nearly all in authority in her day. The English did not trigger her downfall, it was palace politics and sexism, and likely fear of her power.
The lessons are telling today. You can work miracles, but the machinations of any bureaucratic system can be deadlier than slings and arrows of a battlefield of your sworn enemies. You could transpose the palace intrigues of 15th century French and English courts to any bureaucracy today and it would be a near perfect fit, really. Would any bureaucratic leader trust an uneducated, poor, unconnected interloper to provide a vision for change for the failing health and public health system, such as the one facing the United States in 2013?
Sure, such a thought is laughable, but it happened, and can happen again. It may even be needed if things continue on the present course.
In the end, no one remembers the bishops who tried and convicted Joan or the weak king she helped to bring to power, or in fact any of the kings of her day. Likewise, no one remembers or cares about bureaucrats in the end. Why? Quite simply they are not visionaries.
It is Joan who has statues in her honor, countless biographies recounting her legend, and many movies and documentaries exploring her incredible exploits.